Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon Laravel reverb vs soketi
    Reverb Soketi Laravel 11 WebSocket Laravel Echo WebSocket server Laravel broadcasting Redis Pulse PHP 8.2


Laravel reverb vs soketi


Reverb is the new first-party WebSockets package introduced in Laravel 11, which replaces the need for third-party WebSocket servers like Soketi or Laravel Websockets. Here's a comparison of Reverb and Soketi:

Reverb:
- Developed and maintained by the Laravel team, providing tight integration with the Laravel framework [4]
- Utilizes the Pusher protocol, making it compatible with Laravel's broadcasting capabilities and Laravel Echo [4]
- Designed for speed and scalability, with support for horizontal scaling using Redis [4]
- Includes built-in support for monitoring with Pulse [4]
- Requires Laravel 11 and PHP 8.2 or newer [3]

Soketi:
- Third-party WebSocket server, not officially maintained by Laravel [1][2]
- Considered a reliable and stable option by the Laravel community [1][2]
- Easier to set up and configure compared to Laravel Websockets [1][2]
- Supports horizontal scaling and can handle thousands of concurrent connections [1][2]
- Requires separate server setup and configuration [1][2]

Reverb seems to be the recommended choice for new Laravel 11 projects, as it is the official and tightly integrated WebSocket solution. Soketi remains a viable option for older Laravel versions or if you prefer a standalone WebSocket server. However, the search results suggest that Soketi is a more reliable and easier to set up option compared to the previous Laravel Websockets package. [1][2][3][4]

Citations:
[1] https://laraveldaily.com/post/websockets-laravel-soketi-real-time-updates-example
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/laravel/comments/1079lhn/laravel_websockets_vs_soketi_vs_laravel_echo/
[3] https://serverauth.com/posts/deploying-laravel-11-with-reverb-websocket-support
[4] https://reverb.laravel.com
[5] https://github.com/beyondcode/laravel-websockets/issues/1186