Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon How does the Apple Watch Ultra 2's GPS performance compare to Garmin devices in wilderness areas


How does the Apple Watch Ultra 2's GPS performance compare to Garmin devices in wilderness areas


When comparing the Apple Watch Ultra 2's GPS performance to that of Garmin devices in wilderness areas, several factors come into play, including accuracy, reliability, and user experiences.

GPS Performance Overview

1. Dual-Frequency Capability:
- The Apple Watch Ultra 2 features a dual-frequency GPS system that utilizes both the L1 and L5 bands. This technology is designed to improve accuracy in challenging environments, such as dense forests and urban canyons. However, while it performs well in many situations, it may not consistently match the accuracy of Garmin devices, which are often regarded as industry leaders in GPS tracking.

2. Real-World Testing:
- In comparative tests, the Ultra 2 has shown performance that is generally in line with other top multi-band GPS units, such as the Garmin Epix Pro. However, users have reported that the Apple Watch can display erratic readings or inaccuracies, particularly in heavily wooded areas. For example, some users noted discrepancies in distance tracking, with the Ultra 2 often coming up short compared to Garmin models like the Forerunner 955 and Fenix 7, which have demonstrated more reliable GPS accuracy in similar conditions[1][3].

3. User Feedback:
- Many users have expressed frustration with the Ultra 2's GPS accuracy, particularly in wilderness settings. Reports indicate that while the watch can track routes effectively, it sometimes shows significant errors, such as being off by several meters or displaying erratic location jumps. In contrast, Garmin devices are frequently praised for their consistent and precise GPS performance, even in challenging environments[3][4].

4. Battery Life Considerations:
- The Apple Watch Ultra 2 has a battery life of up to 36 hours with regular use, which can diminish significantly with GPS tracking. In contrast, Garmin watches, such as the Fenix series, can last several days to weeks on a single charge, making them more suitable for extended wilderness adventures without access to charging facilities[2][4].

Conclusion

Overall, while the Apple Watch Ultra 2 offers advanced GPS features and performs well in many scenarios, it may not consistently match the accuracy and reliability of Garmin devices in wilderness areas. Users seeking the highest level of GPS performance for outdoor activities may find Garmin models to be a more dependable choice, particularly for long hikes or runs in challenging terrains.

Citations:
[1] https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2023/09/review-focused-progress.html
[2] https://www.wired.com/review/apple-watch-ultra-2/
[3] https://the5krunner.com/2023/09/27/is-apple-watch-ultra-2-accurate/
[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/WildernessBackpacking/comments/16s33vn/do_any_of_you_use_an_apple_watch_ultra_while/
[5] https://www.tomsguide.com/face-off/apple-watch-ultra-2-vs-garmin-epix-2-which-is-best
[6] https://www.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/17ckjoa/dual_gps_question_best_iphone_and_watch/
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR5on-uSAHI
[8] https://www.theverge.com/23663107/apple-watch-ultra-gps-running