The Sharp Aquos R9 Pro and the iPhone 16 Pro Max feature advanced display technologies, but they differ significantly in several key aspects:
Display Size and Resolution
- The Aquos R9 Pro has a 6.7-inch display with a resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of 513 ppi. This high pixel density enhances the clarity and detail of images and text on the screen[1][7].- In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro Max boasts a slightly larger 6.9-inch display with a resolution of 2868 x 1320 pixels, yielding a lower pixel density of 460 ppi. While still sharp, this density is less than that of the Aquos R9 Pro[2][4].
Refresh Rate
- The Aquos R9 Pro supports an impressive refresh rate of 240Hz, which can provide smoother motion during fast-paced activities like gaming or scrolling[1][5].- The iPhone 16 Pro Max, on the other hand, features Apple's ProMotion technology, allowing for adaptive refresh rates up to 120Hz. This means it can dynamically adjust the refresh rate based on the content being displayed, optimizing performance and battery life[2][4].
Display Technology
- Both devices utilize OLED technology, but the Aquos R9 Pro employs Pro IGZO LTPO OLED, which is known for its efficiency and color accuracy[1][5].- The iPhone 16 Pro Max features a Super Retina XDR OLED display, which is designed for high brightness levels and excellent color reproduction, particularly in HDR content[2][4].
Brightness and Contrast
- The Aquos R9 Pro can reach a peak brightness of up to 2000 nits, making it highly visible even in bright outdoor conditions[7][9].- The iPhone 16 Pro Max also excels in brightness, with a maximum peak brightness of up to 2000 nits for outdoor visibility and 1600 nits for HDR content, along with a typical contrast ratio of 2,000,000:1[2][4].
Additional Features
- The Aquos R9 Pro supports features like Dolby Vision HDR and offers a wide color gamut with support for 1 billion colors, enhancing its multimedia capabilities[1][5].- The iPhone 16 Pro Max includes features such as True Tone technology and Haptic Touch, which improve user interaction and visual comfort under varying lighting conditions[2][4].
In summary, while both displays are top-tier in their respective categories, the Sharp Aquos R9 Pro excels in pixel density and refresh rate, whereas the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers superior brightness management and additional interactive features.
Citations:[1] https://en.kalvo.com/sharp-aquos-r9-pro-142317.html
[2] https://support.apple.com/en-us/121032
[3] https://www.devicespecifications.com/en/model/f96c5fd5
[4] https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/iphone-16-pro-max-vs-google-pixel-9-pro-xl-specs-compared/
[5] https://global.sharp/corporate/news/241029-h.html
[6] https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-16-pro-max-display-test/
[7] https://www.devicespecifications.com/en/model/88e161db
[8] https://www.apple.com/iphone-16-pro/specs/
[9] https://www.gsmchoice.com/en/catalogue/sharp/aquos-r9-pro/
[10] https://www.dimensions.com/element/apple-iphone-16-pro-max-18th-gen