The iPhone 16 Pro Max features an advanced Ceramic Shield protection, which offers several benefits over the Aquos R9 Pro's display. Here's a comparison of their protective technologies:
Ceramic Shield Protection (iPhone 16 Pro Max)
- Durability: The Ceramic Shield is claimed to be 50% stronger than its predecessor and twice as resilient as any other smartphone glass, making it particularly effective against drops[1][4]. In tests, it has shown improved resistance to breakage, although it can still crack under significant impact, especially when dropped face down[1][4].
- Drop Performance: Drop tests indicate that while the Ceramic Shield provides better protection than previous models, users should still consider using a case. The iPhone 16 Pro Max can sustain less damage when dropped on its side compared to face-down drops, but it may still fail to function after severe impacts[1][4][9].
- Scratch Resistance: While the Ceramic Shield excels in drop resistance, it does not significantly improve scratch resistance compared to other glass types. Users are still advised to use screen protectors to avoid cosmetic scratches from everyday use[9].
Display Protection (Aquos R9 Pro)
- Display Technology: The Aquos R9 Pro features a Pro IGZO OLED display, which is known for its high resolution and vibrant colors but does not emphasize any specific glass protection technology like Gorilla Glass or Ceramic Shield[2][3].
- Performance Features: The display supports a variable refresh rate of up to 240 Hz, enhancing visual smoothness during use, particularly for gaming and video playback[2]. However, the lack of specific protective claims means its resilience against drops is less documented.
- Water and Dust Resistance: The Aquos R9 Pro offers IPX5/IPX8/IP6X ratings for water and dust resistance, providing a different layer of durability compared to the iPhone's focus on screen protection[2][3].
Summary
In summary, the iPhone 16 Pro Max's Ceramic Shield provides superior drop protection and is specifically designed to reduce the likelihood of screen breakage from falls. However, it does not offer significant improvements in scratch resistance compared to traditional glass. In contrast, while the Aquos R9 Pro's display excels in visual performance with high refresh rates and vivid colors, it lacks detailed information on its protective capabilities against drops. Therefore, for users prioritizing screen durability from impacts, the iPhone 16 Pro Max may be the better choice, albeit with a recommendation to use additional protective measures like cases or screen protectors.
Citations:[1] https://uk.pcmag.com/mobile-phones/154469/iphone-16-ceramic-shield-helps-on-drop-tests-but-you-still-need-a-case
[2] https://global.sharp/corporate/news/241029-h.html
[3] https://versus.com/en/apple-iphone-16-pro-max-vs-sharp-aquos-r9-pro
[4] https://www.pcmag.com/news/iphone-16-ceramic-shield-helps-on-drop-tests-but-you-still-need-a-case
[5] https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006882650452.html
[6] https://www.smartprix.com/mobiles/sharp_aquos_r9_pro_vs_apple_iphone_16_pro_max-cpd1fg8k9elp_pd16zjevw7x.php
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECZZhVC3D8Y
[8] https://www.reddit.com/r/PWM_Sensitive/comments/1ggxmpl/sharp_aquos_r9_pwm_test/
[9] https://www.phonearena.com/news/iphone-16-pro-ceramic-shield-glass-improved_id162653