Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon How does the performance of the RTX 4090 compare to the RTX 4080 for DeepSeek Coder


How does the performance of the RTX 4090 compare to the RTX 4080 for DeepSeek Coder


The performance comparison between the NVIDIA RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 for the DeepSeek Coder reveals significant differences, particularly in the context of AI workloads.

**RTX 4090 Performance: The RTX 4090 is generally recognized as the more powerful card, boasting a higher number of CUDA cores (16,384) compared to the RTX 4080's 7,728 cores. This translates to superior performance across various tasks, including gaming and AI processing. In benchmarks, the RTX 4090 consistently outperforms the RTX 4080 by approximately 25% to 30% in traditional gaming scenarios, which correlates with its enhanced capabilities in handling complex computations required for AI tasks like those performed by DeepSeek Coder[2][3][4].

**RTX 4080 Performance: While the RTX 4080 is still a strong performer and capable of running advanced AI models, it falls short of the RTX 4090's capabilities. In AI benchmarks specifically related to DeepSeek, the RTX 4080's performance is notably less than that of the RTX 4090. For instance, while AMD's RX 7900 XTX has recently been reported to outperform both NVIDIA cards in certain configurations, the RTX 4080 still provides solid performance but is around 15% slower than the RTX 4090 in comparable tasks[1][5].

**DeepSeek Coder Specifics: The DeepSeek Coder is designed to leverage GPU architecture effectively, and while both NVIDIA GPUs can handle its demands, the added CUDA cores and memory bandwidth of the RTX 4090 give it a distinct edge. Users running DeepSeek on these GPUs may notice that complex models and larger datasets are processed more efficiently on the RTX 4090 due to its superior computational power and memory throughput[1][2].

In summary, for users specifically interested in utilizing DeepSeek Coder, the RTX 4090 offers significantly better performance compared to the RTX 4080, making it a preferable choice for demanding AI workloads. However, for less intensive tasks or budget-conscious users, the RTX 4080 still remains a viable option.

Citations:
[1] https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/amd-claims-rx-7900-xtx-outperforms-rtx-4090-in-deepseek-benchmarks
[2] https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4090-vs-rtx-4080/
[3] https://gamerant.com/nvidia-rtx-4080-vs-rtx-4090/
[4] https://www.chillblast.com/blog/nvidia-rtx-4090-vs-rtx-4080-battle-of-the-new-generation
[5] https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/nvidia-geforce-rtx-5080-vs-rtx-4090-which-gpu-reigns-supreme-which-one-should-you-buy/articleshow/117748284.cms
[6] https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/zr92q6/4080_vs_4090/
[7] https://www.reddit.com/r/deeplearning/comments/11w9hkj/how_noticeable_is_the_difference_training_a_model/
[8] https://www.pcworld.com/article/1441779/nvidia-rtx-4090-vs-rtx-4080.html