When comparing the frame rates of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max, particularly in terms of their impact on residual motion, several factors come into play.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Galaxy S25 Ultra supports a variety of frame rates for video recording, including 8K UHD at 30 fps, 4K UHD at 120 fps, and Full HD at 240 fps[1]. These high frame rates can significantly reduce residual motion in video footage, especially when combined with stabilization technologies like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) or Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS). However, in practice, the Galaxy S24 Ultra (a predecessor model) showed effective video stabilization with minimal camera shake during walking or running, though frame shifts were slightly more noticeable compared to the iPhone[4]. This suggests that while the Galaxy series offers robust stabilization, there might be minor residual motion artifacts, particularly in challenging conditions.
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
The iPhone 17 Pro Max is expected to support 4K UHD video recording at 120 fps, similar to its predecessors like the iPhone 15 Pro Max[3]. The iPhone series is known for its excellent video stabilization, often outperforming competitors in terms of smoothness and consistency between frames[8]. The iPhone 15 Pro Max, for example, effectively compensated for motion such as handshake, resulting in sharp and consistent footage[8]. This suggests that the iPhone 17 Pro Max will likely maintain or improve upon this performance, minimizing residual motion effectively.
Comparison
In terms of residual motion, both devices are expected to perform well, but the iPhone series has historically been praised for its superior video stabilization. The Galaxy S25 Ultra's high frame rates and stabilization capabilities will likely reduce residual motion significantly, but it may still exhibit slightly more noticeable frame shifts compared to the iPhone. The iPhone 17 Pro Max, with its expected 120Hz ProMotion display and advanced stabilization, is likely to offer smoother video playback and recording with minimal residual motion.
Overall, while both devices are capable of reducing residual motion effectively, the iPhone's reputation for superior stabilization might give it a slight edge in this regard. However, the actual performance can depend on various factors, including software updates and specific usage scenarios.
Citations:
[1] https://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Samsung-Galaxy-S25-Ultra,Apple-iPhone-17-Pro-Max/phones/12343,12496
[2] https://9to5mac.com/2024/12/30/iphone-17-higher-refresh-rate-displays/
[3] https://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Apple-iPhone-15-Pro-Max,Apple-iPhone-17-Pro-Max/phones/11930,12496
[4] https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-ultra-camera-test/
[5] https://www.tomsguide.com/phones/samsung-phones/7-ways-samsung-galaxy-s25-ultra-beats-iphone-16-pro-max
[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1AdZB0yVl8
[7] https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/iphone-17/
[8] https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-15-pro-max-camera-test/
[9] https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s25_ultra_vs_apple_iphone_16_pro_max_review_battery_camera_price_compared-news-66518.php
[10] https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/iphone-17-pro/