Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon How does the cost of training DeepSeek models compare to Copilot's subscription fees


How does the cost of training DeepSeek models compare to Copilot's subscription fees


Comparing the cost of training DeepSeek models to the subscription fees of Copilot involves understanding two different aspects: the upfront training costs of AI models like DeepSeek and the ongoing subscription fees for services like Copilot.

DeepSeek Training Costs

DeepSeek models, such as DeepSeek V3 and DeepSeek R1, are noted for their relatively low training costs compared to other AI models. For instance, DeepSeek V3 was trained at a cost of approximately $5.5 million[1][5]. DeepSeek R1's training cost is estimated to be around $6 million[4]. These costs are significantly lower than those associated with training models like ChatGPT o1, which are estimated to be between $100 million and $200 million[4].

Copilot Subscription Fees

Microsoft Copilot, on the other hand, is a service that offers AI-driven tools integrated with Microsoft applications. The subscription fees for Copilot are structured as part of Microsoft 365 services, with options for monthly billing. As of December 2024, Microsoft introduced a monthly billing option for Copilot annual subscriptions, priced 5% higher than the upfront annual payment[2][6]. The exact monthly fee for Copilot is not specified in the available information, but it is generally around $30 per month for similar AI services[3].

Comparison

When comparing the costs, DeepSeek offers a more cost-effective option for those who can manage the infrastructure and training themselves. However, this requires significant technical expertise and resources. In contrast, Copilot provides a ready-to-use service with integration into Microsoft applications, which can be more convenient for businesses but comes at a recurring subscription cost.

For organizations prioritizing cost savings and having the capability to manage AI infrastructure, DeepSeek might be more economical. However, for those seeking ease of use and integration with Microsoft tools, Copilot's subscription model may be more suitable, despite its ongoing costs.

Considerations

- Security and Integration: Copilot benefits from Microsoft's robust security framework, which is crucial for enterprises prioritizing data integrity. DeepSeek has faced security concerns, which could outweigh cost savings for many organizations[3].
- Flexibility and Use Cases: DeepSeek is more suited for specific, high-volume text-based applications, while Copilot offers broader functionality across Microsoft applications[3][7].
- Scalability: DeepSeek requires enterprise-grade setup and dedicated support, whereas Copilot scales more easily within the Microsoft ecosystem[7].

Citations:
[1] https://www.seangoedecke.com/is-deepseek-fast/
[2] https://www.sanitysolutions.com/2025-microsoft-pricing-updates-explained/
[3] https://accessorange.com/choosing-ai-copilot-vs-deepseek/?swcfpc=1
[4] https://www.creolestudios.com/deepseek-vs-chatgpt-cost-comparison/
[5] https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1id60qi/big_misconceptions_of_training_costs_for_deepseek/
[6] https://www.stratoscloud.com/blog/microsoft-announces-billing-changes-to-copilot-and-csp-paid-monthly-annual-subscriptions/
[7] https://www.valuecoders.com/blog/ai-ml/deepseek-vs-chatgpt-vs-google-gemini-vs-github-copilot-comparison/
[8] https://dev.to/hanzla-baig/the-ultimate-showdown-chatgpt-vs-deepseek-vs-gemini-vs-copilot-vs-qwen-vs-mistral-33kd
[9] https://www.interconnects.ai/p/deepseek-v3-and-the-actual-cost-of
[10] https://apxml.com/posts/training-cost-deepseek-v3-vs-llama-3