UltraTrac mode performance differs between the Garmin Venu 3 and Forerunner 965 in terms of battery life and tracking accuracy:
Battery Life in UltraTrac Mode
- Garmin Forerunner 965: Can last up to 34 hours in UltraTrac mode, significantly extending its runtime compared to standard GPS modes[1].
- Garmin Venu 3: Battery life in UltraTrac mode is not specified for the Venu 3, but it likely has a shorter runtime than the Forerunner 965 due to its smaller battery capacity.
Tracking Accuracy in UltraTrac Mode
- UltraTrac mode reduces GPS tracking frequency to once per minute on both watches to conserve battery life[1].
- The Forerunner 965 has more advanced GPS capabilities, including multi-band GPS and SatIQ technology[1]. This allows it to maintain better tracking accuracy in UltraTrac mode compared to the Venu 3.
- The Venu 3 relies on standard GPS, so its tracking accuracy in UltraTrac mode may be slightly lower than the Forerunner 965.
In summary, the Garmin Forerunner 965 outperforms the Venu 3 in UltraTrac mode by providing significantly longer battery life and slightly better tracking accuracy, thanks to its more advanced GPS features. The Venu 3 still offers UltraTrac mode for extended activities, but the Forerunner 965 is better optimized for this power-saving setting.
Citations:[1] https://synced.sg/blogs/smartwatches/garmin-venu-3-vs-forerunner-965
[2] https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/healthandwellness/f/venu-3-series/355391/venu-3-or-forerunner-965
[3] https://versus.com/en/garmin-forerunner-965-vs-garmin-venu-3
[4] https://e-catalog.com/cmp/119866/venu-3-vs-forerunner-965/
[5] https://www.gadgetsnow.com/compare-smartwatch/Garmin-Fenix-3-vs-Garmin-Forerunner-965-vs-Garmin-Venu-3