Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon Venue 3 vs forerunner 955 screen comparison


Venue 3 vs forerunner 955 screen comparison


The Garmin Venu 3 and Forerunner 955 are both advanced smartwatches, but they cater to different user preferences and needs, especially when it comes to their display technologies and overall functionalities.

Screen Comparison

Display Technology

- Venu 3: Features an AMOLED touchscreen display, which provides vibrant colors and deeper contrasts. Its resolution is 454 x 454 pixels, offering a sharp and clear visual experience. This makes it particularly suitable for users who prioritize aesthetics and user interface clarity.

- Forerunner 955: Utilizes a transflective MIP (Memory-In-Pixel) display, which is less vibrant than AMOLED but is designed for better visibility in bright sunlight. The resolution here is 260 x 260 pixels, which is significantly lower than that of the Venu 3, resulting in a less detailed display.

Size and Weight

- Venu 3: Measures 45.4 x 45.4 x 12.2 mm and weighs 47 g, making it lightweight and comfortable for all-day wear.

- Forerunner 955: Slightly larger at 46.5 x 46.5 x 14.4 mm and heavier at 52 g, which may be a consideration for users who prefer a lighter watch for extended activities.

Key Features Comparison

- Smart Features: The Venu 3 includes a built-in microphone and speaker, allowing for calls and voice assistant integration, which the Forerunner 955 lacks. It also offers features like advanced sleep monitoring and nap detection, appealing to users focused on overall wellness.

- Fitness Features: The Forerunner 955 is tailored more towards athletes, offering advanced training metrics, built-in maps, and support for multiple sports activities, making it a better choice for serious fitness enthusiasts.

Summary

In summary, the Venu 3 is ideal for users who prioritize a stylish design, vibrant display, and wellness features, while the Forerunner 955 is better suited for athletes needing advanced training analytics and rugged functionality. The choice between them largely depends on whether the user values a high-quality display and lifestyle features over athletic training capabilities and durability[1][2][3].

Citations:
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/GarminWatches/comments/179ydc2/help_me_choose_between_venu_3_vs_fenix_7_vs/
[2] https://synced.sg/blogs/smartwatches/garmin-venu-3-vs-forerunner-955
[3] https://www.gadgetsnow.com/compare-smartwatch/Garmin-Forerunner-955-Non-Solar-vs-Garmin-Venu-3
[4] https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2023/08/garmin-venu-3-in-depth-review-more-sleep-analytics-power-meters-and-more.html
[5] https://forums.garmin.com/sports-fitness/healthandwellness/f/venu-3-series/355391/venu-3-or-forerunner-965
[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwCB4ayuybU
[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baYAQ7sulms