Is the AMOLED screen on the Venu 3 worth the extra cost compared to the MIP screen on the Forerunner 955

Display Quality

- The Venu 3's AMOLED display provides vibrant colors, deep contrasts, and a higher resolution of 454 x 454 pixels, resulting in a sharper and more detailed image compared to the Forerunner 955's 260 x 260 pixel MIP display[2][3].

- AMOLED screens are easier to read in dark conditions, while MIP displays are more visible in direct sunlight[5].

Design and Size

- The Venu 3 has a sleeker, more stylish design with a stainless steel bezel, while the Forerunner 955 has a more sporty, textured look[2].

- The Venu 3 is slightly smaller and lighter at 45.4 x 45.4 x 12.2 mm and 47 g, compared to the Forerunner 955's 46.5 x 46.5 x 14.4 mm and 52 g dimensions[2][3].

Price Difference

- The Venu 3 retails for $449.99, while the Forerunner 955 is priced at $499.99, a $50 difference[2][3].

Target Audience

- The Venu 3 is marketed as a lifestyle watch with wellness features like advanced sleep monitoring and nap detection, while the Forerunner 955 is designed for athletes with more advanced training metrics and multisport capabilities[1][2].

In summary, the AMOLED screen on the Venu 3 provides a superior visual experience and a more stylish design, but the Forerunner 955 offers better visibility in sunlight and more advanced fitness features. The $50 price difference may not be significant for some users, but it's a factor to consider when choosing between the two watches based on personal preferences and needs.