Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon How does the training time of Soft Actor-Critic compare to DQN in OpenAI Gym environments


How does the training time of Soft Actor-Critic compare to DQN in OpenAI Gym environments


the training time and performance of Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) compared to Deep Q-Networks (DQN) in OpenAI Gym environments can be summarized as follows:

1. Training Time:
- The search results do not directly compare the training time of SAC and DQN. However, they provide some insights:
- The Spinning Up documentation for SAC mentions that the implementation does not support parallelization, which could impact the training time compared to parallelized algorithms like DQN.
- The comparative study in the research paper [4] found that DQN and A2C (a policy gradient method) had poor and unreliable performance with certain neural network architectures, while algorithms like PPO showed more consistent performance across different architectures.
- This suggests that the choice of hyperparameters and network architecture can have a significant impact on the training time and performance of different RL algorithms, including SAC and DQN.

2. Performance:
- The search results indicate that SAC generally outperforms DQN in continuous control tasks, such as the Mountain Car Continuous environment.
- In discrete action spaces like CartPole, DQN tends to perform better than SAC.
- The Spinning Up documentation for SAC notes that it is designed for continuous action spaces and may not perform as well in discrete action spaces.
- The comparative study in [5] found that while DQN excels in discrete action spaces, DDPG (a predecessor to SAC) is more suited for continuous control tasks, and PPO shows consistent performance across different environments.

In summary, while the search results do not provide a direct comparison of the training time between SAC and DQN, they suggest that the performance of these algorithms can vary depending on the specific environment and task, as well as the choice of hyperparameters and network architecture. SAC appears to have an advantage in continuous control tasks, while DQN may perform better in discrete action spaces. The training time of these algorithms can also be influenced by factors like parallelization and the complexity of the environment and task.

Citations:
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/reinforcementlearning/comments/dr3u13/soft_actor_critic/
[2] https://spinningup.openai.com/en/latest/algorithms/sac.html
[3] https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Performance-of-DQN-PPO-and-their-reality-checks-on-an-extended-environment-combining_fig2_365056338
[4] https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1702126/FULLTEXT01.pdf
[5] https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=eseundergraduate_research