How does DeepSeek's role-based access control differ from Make.com's access control measures

DeepSeek's Access Control

DeepSeek primarily employs role-based access control (RBAC) as part of its security measures. In RBAC, access permissions are assigned based on the roles users have within the organization. This means that users are granted access to specific data and functionalities based on their job functions, limiting exposure to sensitive information to only those who need it for their work[7]. While DeepSeek focuses on RBAC, there is also a mention of using Relationship-Based Access Control (ReBAC) in some contexts related to DeepSeek, such as in the setup of ReBAC policies for specific applications or integrations[1][4]. However, the primary documented approach for DeepSeek itself is RBAC.

Make.com's Access Control

Make.com, on the other hand, offers granular access control that allows administrators to set permissions for individual users. This approach is more flexible than traditional RBAC, as it enables administrators to restrict access to specific operations, scenarios, or data based on the needs of each user, rather than solely on their role[2]. Make.com also supports role-based functionality to further implement access control management within organizations[5]. Additionally, Make.com emphasizes robust authentication protocols, including OAuth2 and multi-factor authentication, to ensure secure access to the platform[2].

Key Differences

- Flexibility vs. Role-Based: Make.com's access control is more flexible, allowing for granular permissions beyond traditional role assignments. DeepSeek primarily relies on role-based access control, which is simpler but less adaptable to complex organizational structures.
- Security Protocols: Both platforms emphasize secure access, but Make.com highlights additional security measures like OAuth2 and multi-factor authentication, which are not explicitly mentioned in DeepSeek's RBAC context.
- Implementation Context: DeepSeek's use of RBAC is more straightforward and widely documented, while Make.com's approach combines role-based management with more personalized access control options, making it suitable for a broader range of organizational needs.

In summary, while both platforms prioritize access control, DeepSeek focuses on a more traditional role-based model, whereas Make.com offers a more flexible and granular approach to access management.

Citations:
[1] https://www.permit.io/blog/deepseek-completely-changed-how-we-use-google-zanzibar
[2] https://www.vatech.io/tutorial/what-is-make-com-s-security-features
[3] https://www.avigilon.com/blog/access-control-models
[4] https://dev.to/authzed/safeguarding-your-data-when-using-deepseek-r1-in-rag-pipelines-part-1-31d2
[5] https://www.make.com/en/enterprise-security.pdf
[6] https://www.upguard.com/blog/rbac
[7] https://zilliz.com/ai-faq/what-security-measures-does-deepseek-implement-to-protect-user-data
[8] https://www.make.com/technical-and-organizational-measures.pdf