Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon What are the power consumption differences between the MacBook Pro M4 and the RTX 4070 during ray tracing


What are the power consumption differences between the MacBook Pro M4 and the RTX 4070 during ray tracing


The power consumption differences between the Apple MacBook Pro M4 and the NVIDIA RTX 4070 during ray tracing illustrate distinct approaches to performance and efficiency in modern computing.

Apple MacBook Pro M4

The Apple M4 chip, particularly in its Pro and Max configurations, is designed with efficiency in mind. During heavy workloads, including ray tracing, the M4 can consume approximately 70 to 80 watts. This figure represents a brief peak under load, as it typically settles to lower power levels when not fully utilized. For instance, the M4 Max can reach around 57 watts during intensive tasks but generally operates within a range of 50 to 80 watts depending on the specific workload and cooling conditions[1][5][7].

The M4's architecture, built on a second-generation 3nm TSMC process, allows for significant performance gains while maintaining low power consumption. This efficiency is particularly advantageous for laptop users who prioritize battery life and thermal management. The M4 also supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing, making it capable of handling modern graphics tasks effectively without excessive power draw[1][5].

NVIDIA RTX 4070

In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX 4070 exhibits higher power consumption levels during similar workloads. Under typical gaming scenarios with ray tracing enabled, the RTX 4070 can draw between 100 to 115 watts. In synthetic benchmarks, this can peak around 140 watts but usually averages lower during actual gameplay due to dynamic adjustments based on workload demands[2][4][6].

The RTX 4070 leverages its architecture to deliver high performance in ray tracing applications but at a cost of greater energy consumption compared to Apple's M4. For example, while performing at high settings in demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077, the GPU's power usage can reach up to approximately 105 watts[4][8].

Summary of Power Consumption

- Apple M4:
- Typical power consumption: 70-80 watts under heavy load.
- Peaks at around 57 watts during intensive tasks.

- NVIDIA RTX 4070:
- Typical power consumption: 100-115 watts during gaming with ray tracing.
- Peaks around 140 watts in synthetic benchmarks.

In conclusion, while both the Apple M4 and NVIDIA RTX 4070 are capable of handling ray tracing effectively, they do so with significantly different power profiles. The M4 excels in energy efficiency, making it suitable for mobile devices where battery life is critical, whereas the RTX 4070 delivers higher raw performance at the expense of greater power consumption.

Citations:
[1] https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-M4-10-cores-Processor-Benchmarks-and-Specs.835975.0.html
[2] https://gamersnexus.net/gpus/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4070-super-review-benchmarks-vs-rtx-4070-rx-7800-xt-more
[3] https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-M4-Max-defeats-RTX-4070-Desktop-GPU-in-Blender-benchmark-trades-blows-with-RTX-4080-Laptop.920575.0.html
[4] https://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-s-TDP-values-for-the-RTX-4050-4060-and-4070-Laptop-do-not-matter-for-gaming.698161.0.html
[5] https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-M4-Pro-14-cores-Processor-Benchmarks-and-Specs.915303.0.html
[6] https://www.jonpeddie.com/reviews/the-rtx-4070-nvidias-latest-midrange-board-is-put-to-the-test/
[7] https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Pro-16-M4-Max-review-The-M4-Max-is-one-of-the-fastest-mobile-processors.929593.0.html
[8] https://www.reddit.com/r/macgaming/comments/1ha63jz/cyberpunk_2077_m4_pro_mac_mini_vs_nvidia_4070/
[9] https://support.apple.com/en-us/121553