DeepSeek's fine-grained authorization, particularly when integrated with systems like Google Zanzibar, differs significantly from Make.com's access control measures in several key ways:
1. Authorization Approach:
- DeepSeek and Google Zanzibar: DeepSeek is used to automate the generation of relationship-based access control (ReBAC) tuples for Google Zanzibar, which is a fine-grained authorization system. This approach allows for complex, relationship-driven access control rules, enabling highly specific permissions based on the relationships between entities. For example, a user might have different permissions based on their role in a project or their relationship to specific resources[1][6].
- Make.com: Make.com offers granular access control but primarily focuses on role-based access control (RBAC) and attribute-based access control (ABAC) through its platform. While it allows administrators to set permissions for individual users or roles, it does not inherently support the complex relationship-based rules that DeepSeek and Zanzibar enable[2][5].
2. Automation and AI Integration:
- DeepSeek: DeepSeek integrates AI to automate the process of generating access control rules from natural language descriptions. This automation reduces the manual effort required to manage complex access control systems, making it more efficient for large-scale applications[1].
- Make.com: Make.com does not explicitly use AI for automating access control rule generation. Its access control is managed manually by administrators through the platform's interface[2].
3. Complexity and Scalability:
- DeepSeek and Google Zanzibar: The combination of DeepSeek with Google Zanzibar is designed to handle complex, large-scale authorization scenarios. It is particularly suited for environments where access control needs to be highly granular and dynamic, such as in large enterprises with many interconnected services[1][6].
- Make.com: While Make.com provides robust access control features, it is generally more suited for smaller to medium-sized workflows and automations. It does not inherently support the same level of complexity as DeepSeek and Zanzibar, though it can be effective for managing access within its own ecosystem[2].
4. Security Features:
- DeepSeek and Google Zanzibar: The security of DeepSeek and Zanzibar deployments can be enhanced with additional measures like encryption and secure connectivity options, especially when integrated with platforms like Amazon Bedrock[4].
- Make.com: Make.com emphasizes robust security features, including multi-factor authentication, encryption (both in transit and at rest), and regular security audits. It also adheres to compliance standards like GDPR[2][5].
In summary, DeepSeek's integration with Google Zanzibar offers a highly advanced, AI-driven fine-grained authorization system capable of handling complex relationships and large-scale applications. In contrast, Make.com provides robust but more traditional access control measures, focusing on manual management and role-based access within its automation platform.
Citations:
[1] https://www.permit.io/blog/deepseek-completely-changed-how-we-use-google-zanzibar
[2] https://www.vatech.io/tutorial/what-is-make-com-s-security-features
[3] https://www.strongdm.com/blog/fine-grained-vs-coarse-grained-access-control
[4] https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/protect-your-deepseek-model-deployments-with-amazon-bedrock-guardrails/
[5] https://www.make.com/en/enterprise-security.pdf
[6] https://www.descope.com/learn/post/fine-grained-authorization
[7] https://neontri.com/blog/deepseek-features-and-risks/
[8] https://www.make.com/technical-and-organizational-measures.pdf