Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon What are the cost implications of using a local GPU versus a cloud GPU


What are the cost implications of using a local GPU versus a cloud GPU


When comparing the cost implications of using a local GPU versus a cloud GPU, several factors come into play:

Local GPU Costs

- Initial Investment: Purchasing a high-performance GPU requires a significant upfront cost. For instance, top-tier GPUs like NVIDIA's H100 or A100 can be very expensive.
- Maintenance and Upgrades: Local GPUs require ongoing maintenance, including cooling systems and power supplies, which add to the overall cost. Upgrading hardware can also be costly and time-consuming.
- Infrastructure Costs: Running a local GPU setup involves additional expenses for servers, storage, networking tools, and data center management, such as climate-controlled environments and physical security.
- Scalability Limitations: Local GPUs have limited scalability, requiring physical upgrades or purchases of new hardware to increase capacity.

Cloud GPU Costs

- No Upfront Costs: Cloud GPUs eliminate the need for initial hardware purchases, offering a pay-as-you-go model where you only pay for the resources used.
- Flexibility and Scalability: Cloud providers allow easy scaling of resources based on demand, reducing the risk of over-provisioning and lowering the total cost of ownership (TCO).
- Maintenance and Upgrades: Cloud providers handle maintenance and hardware updates, reducing user responsibility and costs associated with upkeep.
- Accessibility and Security: Cloud GPUs are accessible from anywhere and rely on the provider's security protocols, which can be both a benefit and a concern depending on data privacy needs.

In summary, while local GPUs offer full control over hardware and performance, they require significant upfront and ongoing investments. Cloud GPUs provide flexibility, scalability, and cost savings by eliminating upfront costs and maintenance responsibilities, making them ideal for projects with variable resource needs. However, for long-term, consistent use, local GPUs might become more cost-effective over time.

Citations:
[1] https://getdeploying.com/reference/cloud-gpu
[2] https://www.e2enetworks.com/blog/comparison-between-cloud-based-and-on-premises-gpus
[3] https://datacrunch.io/blog/cloud-gpu-pricing-comparison
[4] https://blog.runpod.io/why-run-gpu-workloads-in-the-cloud-over-your-own-cluster/
[5] https://gist.github.com/devinschumacher/87dd5b87234f2d0e5dba56503bfba533
[6] https://www.digitalocean.com/resources/articles/cloud-gpu
[7] https://www.hyperstack.cloud/gpu-pricing
[8] https://acecloud.ai/resources/blog/cloud-gpus-vs-on-premises-gpus/