Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon How does the battery life of the Pixel Watch 3 compare to the Apple Watch Ultra 2


How does the battery life of the Pixel Watch 3 compare to the Apple Watch Ultra 2


The battery life of the Pixel Watch 3 and the Apple Watch Ultra 2 presents notable differences, reflecting their respective design philosophies and functionalities.

Pixel Watch 3 Battery Performance

The Pixel Watch 3 offers an estimated battery life of 24 hours with the always-on display activated. However, it can extend up to 36 hours in Battery Saver mode, which disables certain features to conserve power[1][4]. Users have reported that, in practical use, the watch can last up to 48 hours under moderate usage conditions, especially with the larger 45mm model benefiting from a significantly larger battery compared to its predecessor[2][4].

Key Features Influencing Battery Life:

- Display Technology: The watch features a high-brightness AMOLED display that can adjust its refresh rate down to 1Hz when not in active use, which helps save battery life[2][4].
- Charging Speed: The Pixel Watch 3 charges about 20% faster than previous models, reaching full charge in approximately 15 minutes less time, enhancing usability for users who may need quick top-ups[4].

Apple Watch Ultra 2 Battery Performance

In contrast, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 is designed for longer endurance, boasting a battery life of around 36 hours under typical usage conditions, and it can last up to 60 hours with low-power settings enabled[1][5]. This makes it particularly appealing for users who engage in extended outdoor activities or require a watch that can last through multi-day adventures.

Key Features Influencing Battery Life:

- Robust Design: The Apple Watch Ultra 2 is built with features that support prolonged use, such as enhanced GPS capabilities and a large battery designed for demanding applications like fitness tracking and navigation.
- Low-Power Mode: Similar to Google’s approach, Apple includes a low-power mode that conserves battery by limiting certain functionalities while still allowing essential health tracking features to operate.

Comparative Summary

While both smartwatches are equipped with advanced technology aimed at optimizing battery life, the Pixel Watch 3 is generally expected to require daily charging under normal conditions. In contrast, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 provides a more robust battery performance suited for extended use without daily charging. Overall, users seeking a device that can last longer between charges may find the Apple Watch Ultra 2 more suitable, while those who prefer a device integrated with Google's ecosystem might favor the Pixel Watch 3 despite its shorter battery life.

Citations:
[1] https://www.pocket-lint.com/pixel-watch-3-review/
[2] https://www.multicore.blog/p/45mm-pixel-watch-3-xl-review-big
[3] https://www.pcmag.com/comparisons/google-pixel-watch-3-vs-apple-watch-series-9-which-smartwatch-is-best
[4] https://www.engadget.com/wearables/pixel-watch-3-review-google-finally-got-it-right-especially-with-the-battery-life-170005758.html
[5] https://www.pcmag.com/comparisons/apple-watch-series-10-vs-google-pixel-watch-3-which-smartwatch-is-better
[6] https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/1fcwslj/pixel_watch_3_review_google_finally_got_it_right/
[7] https://www.tomsguide.com/wellness/smartwatches/apple-watch-10-vs-pixel-watch-3-which-smartwatch-wins
[8] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-heSDpMmxk

How does the charging speed of the Pixel Watch 3 compare to the Apple Watch Ultra 2

The charging speed of the Pixel Watch 3 and the Apple Watch Ultra 2 highlights significant differences in their design and user experience.

Pixel Watch 3 Charging Speed

- The Pixel Watch 3 charges 20% faster than its predecessor, taking approximately 60 minutes to reach a full charge from 0% to 100% for the 41mm model. The larger 45mm model takes about 80 minutes to fully charge[1][5].
- Google claims that the watch can reach 80% charge in about 50 minutes, making it relatively efficient for users needing a quick power boost[5].
- However, it uses a pin-based charging system, which some users find less convenient due to alignment issues that can lead to incomplete charging overnight[4].

Apple Watch Ultra 2 Charging Speed

- In contrast, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 supports fast charging, allowing it to reach a full charge in approximately 60 minutes as well, but with a more user-friendly magnetic charging system that typically aligns more easily[1].
- The Ultra 2 can also achieve about 80% charge in around 30 minutes, which is particularly beneficial for users who need quick recharges during busy days or workouts[1].

Summary

While both smartwatches offer competitive charging speeds, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 benefits from a more efficient and user-friendly magnetic charging system, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the Pixel Watch 3's pin-based method. This difference may influence user preference based on convenience and ease of use in daily scenarios.

Citations:
[1] https://www.engadget.com/wearables/pixel-watch-3-review-google-finally-got-it-right-especially-with-the-battery-life-170005758.html
[2] https://www.multicore.blog/p/45mm-pixel-watch-3-xl-review-big
[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/PixelWatch/comments/1fk20wu/charging_wattage_for_pixel_watch_3/
[4] https://www.pocket-lint.com/pixel-watch-3-review/
[5] https://www.tomsguide.com/wellness/smartwatches/google-pixel-watch-3-review
[6] https://store.google.com/gb/product/pixel_watch_3_specs?hl=en-GB
[7] https://www.pcmag.com/comparisons/google-pixel-watch-3-vs-apple-watch-series-9-which-smartwatch-is-best
[8] https://support.google.com/googlepixelwatch/answer/12742648?hl=en-AU