Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon How do historical averages compare to other forecasting methods like ARIMA or exponential smoothing
    forecasting methods historical averages ARIMA exponential smoothing time series forecasting LSTM comparison forecasting accuracy


How do historical averages compare to other forecasting methods like ARIMA or exponential smoothing


here is a summary of how historical averages compare to other forecasting methods like ARIMA and exponential smoothing:

Comparison of Forecasting Methods

1. Historical Averages:
- Historical averages are a simple and robust method for short-term forecasting.
- They are effective at smoothing out noise and capturing recent trends.
- However, historical averages do not capture long-term trends or changes in the underlying patterns, making them less effective for long-term forecasting.

2. ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average):
- ARIMA is a more sophisticated statistical model that can capture complex patterns in time series data.
- ARIMA is effective for both short-term and long-term forecasting, as it can model trends, seasonality, and other non-stationary characteristics.
- ARIMA outperforms historical averages in many cases, especially for long-term forecasts where the underlying patterns are changing.

3. Exponential Smoothing:
- Exponential smoothing is another traditional time series forecasting method that assigns exponentially decreasing weights to past observations.
- Exponential smoothing can capture trends and seasonality, making it more effective than historical averages for medium to long-term forecasting.
- Exponential smoothing is often compared to ARIMA, and the two methods can sometimes produce similar results, depending on the characteristics of the time series.

Comparison from the Search Results

The search results provide some additional insights:

- The first result [1] compares ARIMA and exponential smoothing, showing that the performance of the two methods can vary depending on the specific time series data.
- The second result [2] compares ARIMA and LSTM (a type of deep learning model), and finds that LSTM slightly outperforms ARIMA in time series forecasting tasks.
- The third and fourth results [3, 4] also compare ARIMA and LSTM, and generally find that LSTM can outperform ARIMA, especially for complex, non-linear time series.

Conclusion

In summary, historical averages are a simple and effective method for short-term forecasting, but they are generally outperformed by more sophisticated methods like ARIMA and exponential smoothing, especially for long-term forecasts. ARIMA and exponential smoothing can capture more complex patterns in the data, making them more suitable for a wider range of forecasting tasks. Additionally, newer deep learning-based methods like LSTM have shown promising results in outperforming traditional statistical models in certain time series forecasting scenarios.

Citations:
[1] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258740343_Arima_Model_and_Exponential_Smoothing_Method_A_Comparison
[2] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1631/1/012141/meta
[3] https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10186768
[4] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8614252/
[5] https://developer.ibm.com/tutorials/awb-arima-models-in-r/