Grok 3在编码基准方面表现出了强劲的性能，表现优于OpenAI的GPT-4O [4] [7]。在诸如LCB OCT-FEB之类的编码评估中，Grok 3得分为57，而Grok 3 Mini得分为41，均超过双子座，DeepSeek，Claude和GPT模型[1]。独立测试还表明，解决复杂的编程挑战方面有15％的提高[2]。
Grok 3的速度也脱颖而出，其运行速度比Chatgpt快1.2倍，平均响应时间为0.8秒[2]。软件开发人员在使用Grok 3的代码分析功能时报告了调试会议的30％，其解释复杂算法的能力改善了技术社区的知识共享[2]。
引用：[1] https://www.outlookbusiness.com/start-up/news/elon-musk-unveils-grok-3-how-it-performs-performs-against-openais-popenais-gpt-4o-deepseek
[2] https://9meters.com/technology/ai/grok-3-vs-chatgpt-a-head-to-head-comparparison
[3] https://paperswithcode.com/paper/gpt-4-technical-report-1
[4] https://opentools.ai/news/elon-musks-xai-unveils-grok-3-a-a-game-changer-in-ai--performance and-performance and-capabilities
[5] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38184426
[6] https://www.zdnet.com/article/xais-grok-3-is-better-than-than-preded-how-to-try-try-it-for-for-for-fore-be forefore-you-subscribe/
[7] https://www.chaincatcher.com/en/article/2168125
[8] https://community.openai.com/t/gpt4-comparison-to-anthropic-anthropic-opus-on-benchmarks/726147
[9] https://www.reddit.com/r/openai/comments/1bqdo47/grok_15_now_now_beats_gpt4_2023_in_in_in_humaneval_code/
[10] https://www.datacamp.com/blog/grok-3
[11] https://aider.chat/docs/benchmarks-0125.html