The GPS tracking features of the Google Pixel Watch 3 and the Apple Watch Ultra 2 vary significantly in terms of accuracy and performance, reflecting their different design philosophies and target user bases.
Google Pixel Watch 3 GPS Accuracy
The Pixel Watch 3 utilizes a GPS-only system, which has shown to be less reliable compared to dual-band GPS systems found in some competitors. In practical tests, the watch demonstrated inconsistent GPS tracking, particularly during runs and hikes. For instance, it often recorded positions inaccurately, leading to overestimations of distance traveled. During a 10K run, it lost about 0.08 miles, and for hikes, it added significant extra distanceâ0.25 miles on a 6-mile hike and 0.4 miles on a 10-mile hike[1][2].
Despite these shortcomings, the watch's GPS signal acquisition is relatively quick, typically taking only a few seconds to lock onto satellites[4]. However, users have reported instances where the watch lost GPS signal entirely during activities like cycling through tunnels[4]. Overall, while the Pixel Watch 3 performs adequately for casual users, its GPS accuracy is rated poorly compared to more advanced options.
Apple Watch Ultra 2 GPS Accuracy
In contrast, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 employs a dual-band GPS system, which significantly enhances its tracking capabilities. This technology allows the watch to utilize multiple frequencies from satellites, resulting in improved accuracy and reliability in various environments, including urban areas with tall buildings or dense foliage. Users have noted that the Ultra 2 maintains a consistent track without the erratic behavior sometimes seen in single-band systems like that of the Pixel Watch 3[3].
The Apple Watch Ultra 2 is designed for outdoor enthusiasts and athletes, providing precise distance measurements and seamless integration with navigation features. It has been praised for its ability to accurately map routes even in challenging conditions[3]. The overall user experience with GPS tracking on the Ultra 2 is generally considered superior, making it a preferred choice for serious runners and adventurers.
Summary
In summary, while both watches offer fitness tracking capabilities, their GPS performance diverges sharply:
- Google Pixel Watch 3:
- Uses GPS-only technology.
- Shows inconsistent tracking and often overestimates distances.
- Quick signal acquisition but can lose signal during specific conditions.
- Apple Watch Ultra 2:
- Utilizes dual-band GPS technology.
- Provides accurate tracking with minimal errors.
- Designed for outdoor use with robust navigation features.
For users who prioritize accurate GPS tracking for fitness or outdoor activities, the Apple Watch Ultra 2 stands out as the more reliable option compared to the Google Pixel Watch 3.
Citations:[1] https://www.androidcentral.com/wearables/google-pixel-watch-3-review
[2] https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/google-pixel-watch-3
[3] https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2024/09/google-pixel-watch3-review-sports-fitness.html
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuGgPv8SnqI
[5] https://support.google.com/googlepixelwatch/answer/14983873?hl=en
[6] https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2024/08/google-pixel-watch-3-hands-on.html
[7] https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/google-pixel-watch-3-review-still-my-favorite-android-watch/
[8] https://www.reddit.com/r/GooglePixel/comments/1fcwslj/pixel_watch_3_review_google_finally_got_it_right/