Here is a comparison of how Redis Sentinel and Redis Clustering perform in terms of reliability:
Redis Sentinel
- High Availability: Redis Sentinel provides high availability through automatic failover. If a master node fails, Sentinel will automatically promote one of the replica nodes to become the new master.
- Single Point of Failure: While Sentinel provides high availability, it still has a single point of failure - the Sentinel nodes themselves. If all Sentinel nodes fail, the Redis deployment will lose its ability to perform automatic failover.
- Asynchronous Replication: Redis Sentinel uses asynchronous replication between the master and replica nodes. This means there is a risk of data loss if the master fails before the replicas have fully caught up.
- Limited Scalability: Redis Sentinel is designed for a relatively small number of Redis nodes. It does not provide the horizontal scaling capabilities of Redis Clustering.
Redis Clustering
- Distributed Architecture: Redis Clustering has a distributed architecture with no single point of failure. Data is automatically sharded across multiple Redis nodes.
- High Availability: Redis Clustering provides high availability through automatic failover. If a master node fails, the cluster will automatically promote one of the replica nodes to become the new master.
- Synchronous Replication: Redis Clustering can be configured to use synchronous replication, which provides better data consistency guarantees compared to Sentinel's asynchronous replication.
- Horizontal Scalability: Redis Clustering is designed for horizontal scaling. You can easily add or remove nodes to the cluster to increase capacity.
In summary, Redis Sentinel provides high availability for a relatively small Redis deployment, but has a single point of failure in the Sentinel nodes themselves. Redis Clustering, on the other hand, offers a more distributed and scalable architecture with stronger consistency guarantees, making it a more reliable choice for larger, more demanding Redis deployments.
The choice between Sentinel and Clustering depends on the specific reliability, scalability, and consistency requirements of your application. For mission-critical, highly scalable applications, Redis Clustering is generally the more reliable option.
Citations:[1] https://cloudinfrastructureservices.co.uk/redis-sentinel-vs-cluster/
[2] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/redis-sentinel-vs-cluster-osama-ahmed
[3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53060714/redis-sentinel-standalone-or-cluster-which-is-best-for-session
[4] https://redis.io/docs/latest/operate/oss_and_stack/management/scaling/
[5] https://groups.google.com/g/redis-db/c/KK7LW0dBD5Q