Home Arrow Icon Knowledge base Arrow Icon Global Arrow Icon How does Redis Sentinel compare to Redis clustering in terms of reliability


How does Redis Sentinel compare to Redis clustering in terms of reliability


Here is a comparison of how Redis Sentinel and Redis Clustering perform in terms of reliability:

Redis Sentinel

- High Availability: Redis Sentinel provides high availability through automatic failover. If a master node fails, Sentinel will automatically promote one of the replica nodes to become the new master.
- Single Point of Failure: While Sentinel provides high availability, it still has a single point of failure - the Sentinel nodes themselves. If all Sentinel nodes fail, the Redis deployment will lose its ability to perform automatic failover.
- Asynchronous Replication: Redis Sentinel uses asynchronous replication between the master and replica nodes. This means there is a risk of data loss if the master fails before the replicas have fully caught up.
- Limited Scalability: Redis Sentinel is designed for a relatively small number of Redis nodes. It does not provide the horizontal scaling capabilities of Redis Clustering.

Redis Clustering

- Distributed Architecture: Redis Clustering has a distributed architecture with no single point of failure. Data is automatically sharded across multiple Redis nodes.
- High Availability: Redis Clustering provides high availability through automatic failover. If a master node fails, the cluster will automatically promote one of the replica nodes to become the new master.
- Synchronous Replication: Redis Clustering can be configured to use synchronous replication, which provides better data consistency guarantees compared to Sentinel's asynchronous replication.
- Horizontal Scalability: Redis Clustering is designed for horizontal scaling. You can easily add or remove nodes to the cluster to increase capacity.

In summary, Redis Sentinel provides high availability for a relatively small Redis deployment, but has a single point of failure in the Sentinel nodes themselves. Redis Clustering, on the other hand, offers a more distributed and scalable architecture with stronger consistency guarantees, making it a more reliable choice for larger, more demanding Redis deployments.

The choice between Sentinel and Clustering depends on the specific reliability, scalability, and consistency requirements of your application. For mission-critical, highly scalable applications, Redis Clustering is generally the more reliable option.

Citations:
[1] https://cloudinfrastructureservices.co.uk/redis-sentinel-vs-cluster/
[2] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/redis-sentinel-vs-cluster-osama-ahmed
[3] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53060714/redis-sentinel-standalone-or-cluster-which-is-best-for-session
[4] https://redis.io/docs/latest/operate/oss_and_stack/management/scaling/
[5] https://groups.google.com/g/redis-db/c/KK7LW0dBD5Q