The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra, equipped with the Exynos 2400 chipset, has generated considerable interest due to its performance characteristics compared to its Snapdragon counterpart. Hereâs a detailed overview of its features and performance metrics.
Performance Comparison
Chipset Variants
- Exynos 2400: Used in regions like Europe, the UK, and India.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Available in the US, Canada, China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong.
In benchmark tests, the Snapdragon version generally outperforms the Exynos model. For instance, in Geekbench 6 tests, the Snapdragon variant has a slight edge with about a 7% higher score compared to Exynos[1]. However, the Exynos 2400 shows competitive performance in specific scenarios, particularly in ray tracing tasks where it can outperform Snapdragon under stress conditions[1][3].
Battery Life
One notable advantage of the Exynos 2400 is its battery efficiency. Tests indicate that the Exynos variant offers better battery life in several common tasks:
- Web Browsing: Up to 36% longer battery life.
- 4K Video Playback: Approximately 17% longer than its Snapdragon counterpart.
- Gaming and Zoom Calls: Also shows improved longevity[1].
This efficiency is attributed to its architecture, which includes additional small CPU cores operating at lower clock speeds for lighter tasks, potentially leading to reduced power consumption[1].
Thermal Management
Both chipsets exhibit similar thermal throttling behavior under heavy load; however, the Snapdragon model tends to fall further from peak performance during extended use. The Exynos model maintains a slightly better performance retention rate under stress tests[1][4].
Software Features
The Galaxy S24 Ultra retains robust software functionality across both chipset versions. Notably, it includes Samsung's AI enhancements and supports features like the S Pen with advanced capabilities such as Air actions and handwriting recognition[3].
Conclusion
In summary, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers superior performance in benchmarks and gaming scenarios, the Exynos 2400 excels in battery life for everyday tasks. Users' preferences may vary based on whether they prioritize raw performance or battery longevity. Ultimately, both versions deliver a high-quality experience typical of Samsung's flagship devices.
Citations:
[1] https://www.androidauthority.com/exynos-vs-snapdragon-galaxy-s24-3411235/
[2] https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s24_fe_debuts_with_exynos_2400e_and_a_larger_67_display-news-64693.php
[3] https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s24_ultra-review-2670p4.php
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eTSRngwAK0
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU4Tr-NuLgk
[6] https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test/
[7] https://www.samsung.com/pk/smartphones/galaxy-s24-ultra/compare/
[8] https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S24-vs-Galaxy-S24-Ultra-Watch-the-Exynos-2400-lag-like-crazy-in-everyday-use.797923.0.html
What are the main differences between the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Exynos 2400 in real-world usage
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Exynos 2400 are the two main chipsets powering the Samsung Galaxy S24 series, each with distinct characteristics that affect real-world usage. Hereâs a comparison based on various aspects:
Core Architecture
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3: Features a 1+5+2 configuration, comprising one high-performance Cortex-X4 core, five mid-performance Cortex-A720 cores, and two energy-efficient Cortex-A520 cores. This design focuses on balancing performance and efficiency.
- Exynos 2400: Utilizes a 1+5+4 setup, which includes one Cortex-X4 core, five Cortex-A720 cores, and four Cortex-A520 cores. The additional efficiency cores may enhance battery life during lighter tasks but can lead to lower performance in demanding applications compared to Snapdragon's higher clock speeds[1][4].
Performance Benchmarks
In benchmark tests:
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 scores significantly higher in multi-core tests (7,304 in GeekBench 6) compared to the Exynos 2400 (6,964) and also leads in AnTuTu scores (2,087,940 vs. 1,777,263) [1][2].
- Single-Core Performance: The Exynos 2400 slightly edges out Snapdragon in single-core performance (2,196 vs. 2,193), indicating that for single-threaded tasks, both perform comparably [2].
Gaming Performance
- The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is noted for its superior gaming capabilities due to its Adreno GPU, which supports advanced features like ray tracing and has a higher overall performance rating in graphics-intensive applications [1][4].
- The Exynos 2400, while capable with its Xclipse 940 GPU, has been reported to struggle slightly with high-end gaming scenarios compared to Snapdragon. However, it still performs well for most casual gaming experiences [3][4].
Thermal Management
- Users have reported that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 tends to heat up significantly during intensive tasks, which can lead to thermal throttling and reduced performance over extended periods [3].
- In contrast, the Exynos 2400 has been noted for better thermal management under similar conditions, maintaining cooler operation during heavy usage [3][4].
Battery Life
- The Exynos 2400 generally offers better battery efficiency due to its additional efficiency cores. Users report longer battery life during everyday tasks like web browsing and video playback compared to the Snapdragon variant [1][2].
- Both chipsets have similar thermal design power (TDP), but the Exynos may provide a slight edge in battery longevity for moderate usage scenarios [1].
Conclusion
In real-world usage:
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is preferable for users prioritizing top-tier gaming performance and multi-core processing power.
- Exynos 2400 may be more suitable for those who value battery efficiency and moderate gaming capabilities without excessive heat generation.
Ultimately, the choice between these two chipsets may depend on individual preferences regarding performance needs and device usage patterns.
Citations:
[1] https://www.sportskeeda.com/gaming-tech/snapdragon-8-gen-3-vs-exynos-2400-which-is-the-more-powerful-processor
[2] https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/samsung-exynos-2400-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-3
[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/samsung/comments/1cbct2e/exynos_2400_or_sd_8_gen_3/
[4] https://www.androidauthority.com/snapdragon-8-gen-3-vs-exynos-2400-what-they-mean-for-the-samsung-galaxy-s24-3404960/
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eTSRngwAK0
[6] https://www.androidauthority.com/exynos-vs-snapdragon-galaxy-s24-3411235/
[7] https://versus.com/en/qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-3-vs-samsung-exynos-2400
[8] https://bgr.com/tech/exynos-galaxy-s24-just-isnt-as-good-as-the-qualcomm-version-test-shows/
How does the camera performance of the Exynos Galaxy S24 hold up against the Snapdragon version
The camera performance of the Samsung Galaxy S24 varies between the Exynos and Snapdragon versions, with both offering high-quality imaging but differing in specific aspects. Hereâs a detailed comparison based on real-world usage:
Camera Specifications
Both the Exynos and Snapdragon variants of the Galaxy S24 share identical camera hardware:
- Main Camera: 50MP with f/1.8 aperture
- Ultra-Wide Camera: 12MP with f/2.2 aperture
- Telephoto Camera: 10MP with f/2.4 aperture (3x optical zoom)
- Selfie Camera: 12MP with PDAF
Photo Performance
Color and Exposure
- Exynos Version: Tends to produce warmer colors and more vibrant images, which some users prefer for their aesthetic appeal. It also performs well in terms of exposure across various lighting conditions, providing good contrast and detail[1][5].- Snapdragon Version: Generally offers slightly cooler tones, but maintains excellent color accuracy and exposure. Users have noted that both versions perform similarly in well-lit environments, but the Exynos may provide a bit more life to the images in certain scenarios[5].
Low Light Performance
- Both variants deliver comparable results in low light conditions, capturing images with decent detail and exposure. However, the Exynos version has been reported to exhibit slightly more noise than its Snapdragon counterpart under challenging lighting conditions[1][4].Autofocus
- Both models utilize a robust autofocus system, but the Exynos version has shown some autofocus errors in video mode, which were less prevalent in the Snapdragon variant. This could affect video quality during dynamic shooting scenarios[1][4].Video Performance
Stability and Quality
- The Exynos version tends to produce warmer video footage with good stabilization, while the Snapdragon version may capture more detail but can struggle with noise levels in low light. Both models can shoot up to 8K video, but users have noted that video quality is generally smoother on the Snapdragon variant due to better handling of dynamic scenes[1][5].Noise Levels
- In low-light video recording, the Exynos version has been observed to apply more aggressive noise reduction, which can lead to a softer image compared to the sharper details captured by the Snapdragon model[5].Conclusion
In summary, both the Exynos and Snapdragon versions of the Galaxy S24 offer excellent camera capabilities:
- Exynos Version: Warmer colors and vibrant images; slightly better in everyday photography; some autofocus issues in video mode.
- Snapdragon Version: More consistent detail retention; better performance in low-light video; slightly cooler color tones.
Ultimately, user preference may dictate which model performs "better," as both have strengths that cater to different photographic styles and needs.
Citations:[1] https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test/
[2] https://www.dxomark.com/samsung-galaxy-s24-camera-test-2/
[3] https://news.samsung.com/in/galaxy-s24-series-expands-with-s24-fe-a-premium-experience-that-makes-full-galaxy-ai-capabilities-attainable-for-more-users
[4] https://amateurphotographer.com/review/samsung-galaxy-s24-review/
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7b_hK0NE4Q4
[6] https://bgr.com/tech/exynos-galaxy-s24-just-isnt-as-good-as-the-qualcomm-version-test-shows/
[7] https://www.androidauthority.com/exynos-vs-snapdragon-galaxy-s24-3411235/
[8] https://nanoreview.net/en/phone/samsung-galaxy-s24-exynos